NEWS & EVENTS
|
In a previous post, I outlined the joint-by-joint approach to performance training. This approach, based on the fact that adjacent joints tend to lie on opposing sides of the mobility-stability continuum governs every aspect of athletic movement and performance. In case you missed it, you can check it out at our blog here:
Is glute dysfunction limiting your performance?
Synergistic Dominance
For some people, it’s helpful to think of a coworker/family member/teammate/friend that they rely heavily on in one way or another. Now imagine if this person went on a 1-month vacation and you had to pick up the slack. You could probably handle the extra stress for the 1st week, maybe even the first two, but eventually you’d snap. After all, you can only handle so much in your life and most of us are already overworked!
Performance Implications
Take Home Message To your success,
Kevin Neeld, MS, CSCS
Bookmark:
Over the last several years, Michael Boyle and Gray Cook’s “Joint-by-Joint Approach to Training” have changed the way the sports performance world looks at athletic development. Starting from the ground up, the joint-by-joint system outlines that the body has joints alternating in emphasis on whether they need mobility or stability to maximize function. Look at the chart below for more specific details on which joints need mobility and which need stability (note that if you read from left to right, you’ll see the progression from the ground up within the body: ankle -> knee -> hip -> lumbar (low back) -> thoracic (upper back) -> scapulothoracic (shoulder blades) -> glenohumeral (shoulder joint) -> elbow).
The Mobility-Stability Continuum
![]() Performance Implications If your ankle lacks mobility, you’ll get it from your knee. Result = knee pain (common in basketball players. If your hip lacks mobility, you’ll get it from your lumbar spine. Result = back pain (common in just about everyone, but especially hockey players and golfers). A lack of glenoumeral mobility results in increased range of motion and stresses across the elbow (common in tennis and baseball players). The list goes on. You can see how this joint-by-joint approach creates a paradigm that explains so many athletic injuries. While I’m sure this wasn’t the original intention of either Coach Boyle or Gray Cook, this idea has been interpreted in a black and white fashion: Joints either need mobility or they need stability. The truth is that EVERY joint falls somewhere on a mobility-stability continuum: ←----------------------------- Mobility Core Rotation Example Let’s take a look at the lumbar spine. Each segment of the lumbar spine has about 2-4 degrees of rotation range of motion, for a total of about 13 degrees total rotational capacity. In contrast, the thoracic spine has in excess of 70 degrees (and so do the hips: about 30-50 degrees in both internal and external rotation). From this viewpoint, it’s obvious that we should be emphasizing rotation through the hips and thoracic spine and NOT through the lumbar spine. This fits well in the mobility/stability table above. Failure to do so results in excess rotation through the lumbar spine, which can cause a host of disc and spinal bone issues. With that said, it’s important to note that we still NEED that 13 degrees of rotation range of motion in the lumbar spine and should use it. We don’t want to force motion past the end range of the joint, but using the allowable motion is absolutely essential to efficient movement. Coming back to the continuum, understand that even joints that necessitate a high level of mobility (e.g. the glenohumeral or “shoulder” joint) absolutely need some requisite stability. The same is true for the ankle. In both cases, ligament damage due to injury creates an increase in joint laxity, which by definition improves mobility. However, this mobility comes at the expense of NECESSARY structural stability and increases the risk of subsequent injury to that joint (one example of why previous injury is the best predictor of future injury). In reality, these joints probably don’t belong in columns as much as a continuum as displayed below. ←----------------------------- Glenohumeral Hip/Ankle Take Home Message When we think of maximizing human performance, we can never think in black and white terms. Each joint needs a specific balance of mobility and stability. If you take only one thing from this discussion, it should be that the body functions as a cohesive unit, meaning limitations in one area will absolutely affect (usually negatively) both adjacent areas and areas further up/down an anatomical pathway. This is just one more reason why isolation training is moronic.
Bookmark:
Last week, Eric Cressey put up a few great posts on an issue that I think everyone working in the human performance arena should be aware of. You can check them out here:
Preventing Lower Back Pain: Assuming is Okay Healthy Shoulders with Terrible MRIs?
Despite the last title, these three posts contain a lot of great information. The big take home message from all these posts is that many people (athletes and non-athletes alike) have positive MRI findings (positive MRIs means something is wrong), despite not having ANY symptoms. This is most profound in the lower back area, where one study found that 82% of the 98 MRIs taken of asymptomatic individuals came back showing a spinal disc abnormality (Jensen et al, 1994). Eric points on in these posts that similar (although not QUITE as profound) findings have been found in the knees and shoulders of various athletic and non-athletic populations.
Recall from my post Off-Season Hockey Leads You to Surgery? that similar findings have been found in the hips of elite level hockey players. To refresh your memory, the article found that MRIs of 39 NHL and NCAA Division 1 players, twenty-one (54%) had labral tears, twelve (31%) had muscle strains, and 2 (5%) had tendinosis (degeneration of the tendon). Overall, 70% of these hockey players, who otherwise present as "healthy", had irregular findings on their MRIs.
The Take Home Message
We could have a very length discussion about how to interpret all this information, but one major question arises: "If they're asymptomatic, do the positive MRI findings matter?"
The answer is yes. While positive MRI findings shouldn't be taken as an instant justification for surgery, they still shouldn't be overlooked. It's likely that many of these individuals are just "sub-clinical", meaning they have a pathology that isn't normal, but hasn't yet advanced to the point of pain or disability...yet.
A major take home from these studies is that many athletes that appear fine probably have some pretty serious injury predispositions. Any injury (even subclinical) can cause neural alterations to the timing and strength of signals sent to various muscles, and therefore have a profound impact on movement.
This latter point was the main message in Proprioception and Neuromuscular Control in Joint Stability, the awesome text book I've spent the last 9 months reading.
When I read stuff like this it just reinforces how important it is to teach and emphasize proper movement patterns. It makes me wonder if my half dozen left shoulder injuries, bilateral hamstring tears, 5+ year groin pain, and double hernia surgery could have been prevented had I worked with a quality Strength and Conditioning Coach when I was younger. It also makes me nervous for the countless young players out there that think they can "do it on their own".
Exercise isn't as simple as people think it is. Injuries don't happen by accident. Coaching isn't a commodity; it's a necessity. Hopefully athletes will hear this message from a decent strength coach before they hear it from a physician. To your success, Kevin Neeld
Bookmark:
A couple weeks ago, we hosted our 1st ever Season Intern Fun Circuit. Our three Summer interns completed a formidable circuit, racing against the clock. Check out the videos below: Part 1
Part 2
Summer 2010 Intern Fun Circuit Awards: Dan Folkman wins the "Fastest Time Award", even after his 30s penalty for having sub-par push-up form. Congrats Dan!
Katie Wolf gets our "Comeback Player of the Year Award". After spontaneously calling my bluff that we were using a new cotton candy scented floor cleaner (See 1:01 mark of Part 2 video),
Katie picked herself up and pushed through the end of the circuit. Staff and interns alike were impressed with her resiliency and determination.
Matt Siniscalchi wins our "Big Hat; No Cattle Award". Those Rowan students. If only their legs were as strong as their biceps.
Congratulations to all three interns for finishing the fun (death) circuit and setting the bar for interns to come! -Kevin Neeld
Bookmark:
Every week I get questions about core training from athletes and parents. Core training is right there with conditioning as being one of the most MISunderstood aspects of athletic development.
Cross Section of the Midsection
Medial and Lateral Hip Musculature
Dozens of Posterior Muscles Attaching to the Hips and Spine The core includes every muscle (several dozen) that attaches to the hips and spine. Collectively, these muscles serve to:
Bookmark:
|
|
Search Posts
CategoriesEndeavor in the Media Athletic Development Nutrition Advice Weight Loss Golf Training Endeavor Training Maximum Strength Endeavor Athlete Success Back Pain Supplements Injury Prevention Hockey Training Quote of the Week Training Intangibles Power Development Core Training Sport-Specific Conditioning Monthly Archives |
| Translate: |






